Sabiha - Interview 19  

Sabiha - Interview 19

Age at Interview: 53
Sex: Female
Background: Sabiha is a medical secretary and a counsellor. She has 2 children aged 26 and 17. Ethnic background/nationality: Pakistani.

Brief outline:Sabiha took part in a trial of breast screening for younger women (under 50). More recently she volunteered for a trial of cholesterol-lowering drugs but was not eligible because her cholesterol level was too low.

More about me...

To watch or read an interview clip, click on the heading that interests you. Either a video,audio recording or text will open, depending on the clip
To close transcript boxes, click here
To print the interview’s text, click here
Appointments at evenings and weekends would make it easier for people. A token payment for their time might also help, and would not put pressure on people.

 



And I don’t know if sometimes people can’t take part in it because of time. And if they’re committed and they’re working and they’ve got a full-time job, to take time off is not easy. And I think it would be nice if all these trials are a bit flexible, in that they try, I mean they do these kind of tests at weekends and evenings. Then there might be more people that would come forward, because during the day when people are working they’re committed and it’s difficult for them to take time off.
 
What do you think about paying people to take part in trials? Obviously with the kind of the Northwick Park* ones, that’s different.
 
Yes.
 
But in these kind of routine healthcare kind of trials, what do you feel?
 
I think more people would take part if they were paid for these trials. Sometimes it might not be possible for the trial organisation to pay them, because of funding or whatever. But I think more people would take part if they were paid for what they were taking part in, because it is, it is, I mean, their commitment. And if they’re taking part, I think if they’re not paid, it’s nice of the people to give their time. Whereas if they were paid, there would be more people that would take part in it, because at least they would get some kind of token for what they’re doing. So it’s, it’s important, really. But as I said, sometimes the funding gets in the way. And it’s, it’s not the person who’s doing the research, it’s not their fault. It’s somewhere else where the problem lies, but they might have to face the music.
 
I think also there are sometimes ethical issues about paying people, and whether then people are going to feel kind of pressured into taking part because there’s money attached to it.
 
Well, it’s not, it’s not a binding on anyone. It’s their own choice. So I think if they’re getting paid it’s not, it’s not really putting pressure on them. It’s their choice. It’s, you’re not, you’re not being forced to do something against your wishes. So it’s not, it’s not something that they’re forced to do. So it’s their choice.
 
* FOOTNOTE: The interviewer is referring to a Phase 1 trial at a commercial research unit based at Northwick Park Hospital in 2006 when 6 healthy volunteers became extremely ill. ‘First-time-in-humans’ studies are carried out precisely because we need to find out about possible risks and side effects before giving the treatment more widely. Most of the people we talked to took part in trials of treatments which had already been tested in humans before.
 
A copy of the Inquiry Report of this incident can be downloaded from the Department of Health website:
 

Clinical trials
   Support our work

Mail to a friend

Send