Subject index 

Tina had cervical screening in 2006 using liquid based cytology. She experienced no discomfort and did not have to return for a repeat smear, so she feels liquid based cytology was a more successful method.
Tina had cervical screening in 2006 using liquid based cytology. She experienced no discomfort and did not have to return for a repeat smear, so she feels liquid based cytology was a more successful method.
Tina had cervical screening in 2006 using liquid based cytology. She experienced no discomfort and did not have to return for a repeat smear, so she feels liquid based cytology was a more successful method.
Paula had CIN3 and high grade CGIN in 2007. Lletz treatment and a cone biopsy successfully removed the abnormal cells. Her colposcopy results in April 2008 were normal.
Christine had cervical screening in 2007 using liquid-based cytology. She has always had normal test results.
Cathy had an abnormal smear test result in 2007 and she was asked to return for a repeat smear six months later which was normal.
Cathy had an abnormal smear test result in 2007 and she was asked to return for a repeat smear six months later which was normal.
Tina had cervical screening in 2006 using liquid based cytology. She experienced no discomfort and did not have to return for a repeat smear, so she feels liquid based cytology was a more successful method.
Christine had cervical screening in 2007 using liquid-based cytology. She has always had normal test results.
   Support our work

Mail to a friend

Send