home
a-z of conditions
forums
news
about us
See all conditions
Cancer
Cervical Screening
Forum
Resources & Information
Subject index
Credits
Full list of topics
Cervical screening :
Experiences of Cervical Screening
Reasons for attending
Reasons for not attending
Receiving cervical screening test results
Normal and inadequate test results
Abnormal test results
Abnormal cervical cells: discovery :
The Colposcopy examination
Being referred for colposcopy and treatment
Ideas about causes
Finding information
Abnormal cervical cells: treatments :
Loop diathermy (LLETZ)
Cone biopsy
Laser therapy
Cryotherapy
Cold coagulation
Hysterectomy
Abnormal cervical cells: living with it :
Living with abnormal cervical cells
Sources of support
Messages to other women
Search the whole site
Search in this condition
Cervical Screening
Subject index
Clip
Cancer
>>
Cervical Screening
>>
Age 31-44
>>
Interview 28
>>
She received her smear test results in two different geographical areas.
Normal smear test results.
Cancer
>>
Cervical Screening
>>
Age 45-59
>>
Interview 14
>>
She felt very worried when she got overlapping test results letters from the health authority and her GP.
Normal smear test results. Experience of an inadequate smear.
Cancer
>>
Cervical Screening
>>
Age 31-44
>>
Interview 26
>>
Receiving an abnormal result by letter frightened her.
Abnormal smear in 1996. Referred to colposcopy clinic. Diagnosed with abnormal cervical cells (borderline). No treatment give. Abnormal smears between 1996-2001. Referred to colposcopy clinic a further two times. No treatment given. Normal smear test result in 2001.
Cancer
>>
Cervical Screening
>>
Age 45-59
>>
Interview 21
>>
She preferred to receive her abnormal smear result by letter rather than being asked to make an appointment with her GP.
Abnormal smear in 1998. Referred to colposcopy clinic. No treatment needed. Abnormal smears 1998-2001. Referred to colposcopy clinic. No treatment needed.
Mail to a friend